Start for Free

Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I

Author
L. Kimbell
Year
2011
Type
journal article
Category
Teoría y Diseño
This paper traces how the idea of 'design thinking' moved from research on designers into management education and consulting, and argues that the concept rests on questionable assumptions about thinking versus acting, about a single generalized design process, and about the designer as the sole agent of design.
Lucy Kimbell's 'Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I' reviews how the term design thinking, originally used to describe how professional designers solve problems, was taken up over the 2000s by management educators and consultancies as something of value to firms trying to innovate and to societies trying to bring about change. The paper identifies three common accounts of design thinking, as a cognitive style, as a general theory of design, and as a resource for organizations, and argues that each rests on problematic assumptions. These include a false separation between thinking and knowing on one hand and acting in the world on the other; a generalized notion of design thinking that ignores how diverse and historically situated designers' actual practices and institutions are; and an account that gives the individual designer too central a role as the agent of designing. Published in Design and Culture, 3(3), 285 to 306. Credits: Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306. http://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216

Where to find it

In the framework

  • Dialogue · element

In the book

  • Chapter 12, section 123 · Frontier Dimension
Academic papers