Design Research and the New Learning

Author
R. Buchanan
Year
2001
Type
journal article
Category
Bibliografía citada
Richard Buchanan examines the state of design research as an institutional field, addressing uncertainty about its value, its nature, and who should carry it out. He introduces an influential distinction between basic, applied, and clinical design research, and traces four historical "orders" of design that expand what counts as a design "product."
Richard Buchanan's 2001 Design Issues paper addresses how to shape and sustain design research programs within institutions. Despite a growing body of published design research, Buchanan notes persistent uncertainty about the value of design research, its nature, the institutional framework needed to support and evaluate it, and who is best placed to carry it out, in short, uncertainty about whether design knowledge merits serious academic attention. The paper introduces a distinction between basic, applied, and clinical design research that has become influential in how design research is understood academically, and it traces four historical "orders" of design, illustrating how the definition of a design "product" has evolved over time from physical artifacts to increasingly complex systems and environments. Credits: Buchanan, R. (Autumn de 2001). Design Research and the New Learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3-23. Also listed as: Buchanan, R. (2001). Design Research and the New Learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3–23.

In the framework

  • Wicked Problems · problem type
  • Four Orders of Design · concept
  • Outcomes Component

In the book

  • Chapter 1, section 008 · Wrestling with Wickedness: The Tangled Knots of Now
  • Chapter 2, section 014 · Design in Flux: A System Adrift in Time
  • Chapter 4, section 030 · From Tame Blueprints to Wicked systems
  • Chapter 10, section 104 · Core Dimension
  • Chapter 16, section 154 · Our creations (What?)
Academic papers