ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution
Jeff Schmaltz, MODIS Land Rapid Response Team, NASA GSFC
Adopted by: Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) · Kind: Binding treaty · Scope: Regional (Southeast Asia) · Adopted: 2002
A binding regional treaty adopted by the member states of ASEAN in 2002 and in force since 2003, written for one specific recurring harm: smoke from land and forest fires that crosses national borders. Prevention and monitoring are named as the primary duty, with emergency response as the backstop, and the treaty followed more than a decade of softer regional measures that proved insufficient. It was the first regional treaty anywhere aimed specifically at haze pollution, and it is now ratified by all ten ASEAN member states, Indonesia only in 2015.
The ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution was adopted at Kuala Lumpur in 2002 and entered into force on 25 November 2003. It did not appear from a single negotiation. It was the endpoint of more than a decade of escalating regional response: a 1990 call by ASEAN environment ministers for harmonised practice on transboundary pollution, the 1995 ASEAN Cooperation Plan on Transboundary Pollution, and the 1997 Regional Haze Action Plan. Each was a step toward binding law taken because the softer measure before it had proved insufficient. An earlier and broader instrument, the 1985 ASEAN Agreement on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, had first named transboundary air pollution as a regional concern, but in practice it is largely superseded by this more specific text.
Unlike the broad framework conventions held elsewhere in this bank, the Agreement is written for one named recurring harm. Its subject is haze pollution from land and forest fires, largely linked to agricultural and plantation land clearing, which repeatedly affects several Southeast Asian countries at the same time. Naming the harm that precisely is what allows the treaty to place obligations on the activity that produces it rather than on the pollution as an abstraction.
The order of duties in the Agreement is deliberate. Its stated objective is to prevent and monitor transboundary haze pollution from land and forest fires, mitigated through concerted national effort intensified by regional and international cooperation. Prevention and monitoring are the primary duty; emergency response is the backstop that applies when prevention has already failed.
The Agreement also carries its own limitation in plain sight, in its ratification record. Indonesia, the country whose land-clearing fires are the largest recurring source of the region's haze, did not ratify until 2015, more than a decade after the Agreement entered into force for other parties. A regional treaty that binds everyone except the state most central to the problem shows exactly how hard the binding step is, and the Agreement's own history says so rather than hiding it.
It remains the first regional treaty anywhere aimed specifically at haze pollution, and it is now ratified by all ten ASEAN member states. The complete text is published by ASEAN itself.
Key provisions · 4 provisions
Principle 1
The Agreement targets one specific, recurring regional harm: haze pollution from land and forest fires that crosses borders and affects multiple Southeast Asian countries at once.
haze-pollution · transboundary-harm
Principle 2
The Agreement's stated objective names prevention and monitoring of transboundary haze pollution as the primary duty, mitigated through national effort intensified by regional and international cooperation, with emergency response as the backstop.
prevention · monitoring
Principle 3
The treaty grew out of a decade of escalating regional cooperation measures, becoming binding law only after earlier non-binding measures proved insufficient.
institutional-history · binding-law
Principle 4
The Agreement's own ratification history shows Indonesia, the country whose land-clearing fires are the largest recurring source of the region's haze, did not ratify until more than a decade after the Agreement took effect for other parties, illustrating the difficulty of binding the state most central to the problem.
ratification · accountability